What the Other Side Will Argue — and What Your Claim Has to Prove
A civil claim does not succeed just because someone was hurt; the other side will usually test each part of it. In a negligence claim, the questions generally are four: did the party owe you a duty of care, did it breach that duty, did the breach cause your injury, and did the injury lead to damages, meaning real losses. In a product liability claim, the questions generally are whether the product had a defect and whether that defect caused your injury.
An injury does not by itself prove anyone's fault, and an accident does not by itself prove a defect. Whether any of these elements is met depends on the facts, which is why the records from the previous step carry so much weight.
The other side may also point to your own conduct, and fault rules differ by state. Under comparative fault, responsibility is divided among the people involved, including you, and what can be recovered may be reduced by your share. Under contributory fault, an older, stricter rule, an injured person's own fault can bar recovery. Which rule applies, and how, depends on the state.
Damages are the categories of loss the law may allow, such as medical expenses, lost wages and other losses the applicable law names. What a court may allow depends on the state's law and the evidence, and nothing on this page suggests whether any reader has a claim or what it would involve.
What this means for you: each element is something evidence has to support, and your own state's fault rule can change what remains possible. If you are thinking about a claim, matching the records you hold to each of these questions, and asking how your state's fault rule works, are useful topics for a conversation with an attorney.